COMPARE Columbia University MAFN vs University of Chicago MFIN

  • Thread starter Thread starter finbcy
  • Start date Start date
Rank
Program
Total Score
Peer Score
% Employed at Graduation
% Employed at 3 months
% Employed in the US
Compensation
Cohort Size
Acceptance Rate
Avg Undergrad GPA
Tuition
Rank
9
Columbia University New York, NY 10027
4.65 star(s) 17 reviews
9
Columbia University
77 3.4 49 75 60 129.2K 109 22.11 98.93K
NR
University of Chicago Chicago, IL 60637
4.00 star(s) 1 reviews
NR
University of Chicago
116 114K
Joined
2/17/25
Messages
5
Points
1
Hey all!

I’m deciding between Columbia’s Mathematics of Finance (MAFN) and Chicago Booth’s Master in Finance (MiF). I’m open to both quant and traditional finance. Which program is generally better in terms of reputation, career outcomes, and overall value?

Would appreciate any insights. Thanks!
 
Last edited:
Congrats on getting into both programs.
1) Please add your application timelines to the Tracker. Thanks for your contribution.
2) Columbia is mathematical rigorous. You can see its placement record over the years on QuantNet rankings.
Chicago Booth MiF is a brand new program which has not graduated a single student yet. It will take a few years to get a sense of how well they place the students.
Here is a review University of Chicago - Master in Finance - Reviews
 
Back
Top Bottom