Masters choice physics or computer science?

[Hero]

Hello,
I'm new to this site and was hoping to get some advice on my master's choice. Currently I have an offer for a master's from imperial for optics and photonics( specialised field in physics) and warwick for computer science. Imperial starting next month, Warwick in 2 weeks... Haha.
My undergrad was in physics.

Links to course page: Imperial ,,, Warwick.

I applied for the MSc in computer science because I wanted to improve my employability for quant roles and for general SE. Although, in my undergrad I did some scientific programming in python and molecular simulation with a HPC it's still not enough for either Job.The photonics course is more experimental work and in my opinion seems more fulfilling. So which is better overall?

 

[AlexanderMcFarlane]

On the Warwick course: I've just opened a role for a Python Dev in my startup and 99% of the 260 applications are "wannabe data scientists" - it's a flooded market. You won't be any better at coding for it and if anything the "data scientist" angle might just put people off...

I would pick Imperial, on two accounts
1) Branding is everything. Hiring managers don't care "who your supervisor was" or if you "did hard modules" - it's as simple as "did they go to XYZ university ? If yes: telephone interview." They have 10000 CVs to filter so it's no wonder.
2) Don't underestimate the utility of being in London for interviews. Warwick is in a field in the middle of nowhere. At Imperial you could do an interview in your lunch break.

I would say though that Optics is a bit far out for being a quant. However, you won't be the first or the last. Just try and minimise the labs as they will be totally useless for you!

 

[Hero]

I appreciate the response.

I noticed on your profile. You have the ideal background for quant research work. TP + lot of relatable work experience + experience in programming. I can definitely see why the banks were impressed and circulated your CV. But was the Edinburgh brand reputation really the main factor?

I noticed in another thread, although it's 12 years old, executives looked at Communication and skills as a key factor. Brand rep probably does have a big influence but maybe the difference between Warwick and imperial is negligible? Sorry for clarifying I'm still trying to understand the employer outlook/ thought process.
This thread: How to Get a Quant Job, Advice from Wall Street Executives

Also, regarding the point 2. Interviewing would definitely be easier. Unfortunately, as I don't have a relevant internship I'm considering doing something in the third term. Which may be feasible alongside a Comp Sci diss, ( no lab work). Thoughts on this?

Also I really appreciate you replying! It's really helpful knowing someone walked a similar path.