These are objective opinions from the data that CMU MSCF is superior to UChicago in various aspects.
- Rankings
As you can see from the QuantNet ranking, CMU is #3 behind Princeton and Baruch, but UChicago is #7.
- Carrier Outcomes
CMU has one of the strongest connections in New York (because CMU MSCF has a campus there), where top-tier funds and investment banks are most concentrated, alongside of Baruch, MIT and Columbia, so if you want a job in New York or Pittsburgh, CMU is your better choice. My friend also attended CMU New York campus and received an offer from a hedge fund. (The basic premise is that the market has been bad for the past few years, so employment results have been down everywhere.)
- Expected Salary.
According to official data, the average salary at CMU MSCF is $165,025, while UChicago MSFM is $134,285. If the scholarship from UChicago is $20,000 - $30,000, I will chose CMU. Because there is a $30,000 difference in just the first year, and this difference is compounded and widened every year if you can work in NYC, the financial capital of the world.
- Quality of Education
Regarding cohort size, CMU is 101 (NUC: 53, PGH 48) and Chicago is 153; CMU is more likely to have a higher quality education with closer distance to professors. Financial engineering professors are usually well-known practitioners in the industry, so connections with them are very important. Actually my friend I mentioned got a summer internship (and was subsequently hired) at HF in NY through a professor's referral and recommendation.