COMPARE New York University - MS in Mathematics in Finance vs Columbia University - MA in Mathematics of Finance

[IntoDarkness]

mafn is not very well structured

 

[CourantMathFinance]

mafn is not very well structured

This looks like useful feedback to me. Any chance you'd be willing to elaborate?

 

[JSchmo]

Hi, I've been admitted to both programs and can't seem to reach a decision between them.

Most reviews on MAFN are outdated so would appreciate any advice from recent students. I like the math focus however I see there are no elective courses on Microstructure or programming focused courses in general...

Columbia MAFN alum here. First off, congratulations on being accepted into 2 fantastic programs! I put a review up on QuantNet for the Columbia MAFN program last year and based on conversations I've had with those currently still in the program the points I made in that review still appear to apply.

To your point on programming courses, the Columbia MAFN program usually offers an elective course called Math GR5260 Programming for Quantitative & Computational Finance in both the fall and spring semesters, where C++ is used in the fall and Python is used in the spring. It's a very popular course and the classmates I've spoken to who took it enjoyed it. Furthermore, the mandatory core course MATH GR 5030 Numerical Methods in Finance involves working with Excel/VBA, most statistics courses use R, and most other courses typically let you/your project group use whichever programming language you want for your assignments (With the majority of students using Python). Beyond this, I don't recall an all-encompassing course specifically about microstructure, but concepts from it are within elective courses like Math GR 5300 Hedge Funds Strategies and Risk and Math GR5380 Multi-Asset Portfolio Management to name a couple.

Personally, I would suggest learning to code in at least one language prior to enrolling if you choose to join the Columbia MAFN program, as many courses will assume you know how to code already. I took the C++ course from QuantNet along with the Python course from ScriptUni prior to enrolling and found both to be a solid foundation for my work in the Columbia MAFN program.

Hope that helps! Ultimately, no matter which you choose, you'll come out with a great education and opportunities for a career in finance. I've actually worked with a few alumni from the NYU MathFin program and we've talked a lot about the similarities in our experiences.

mafn is not very well structured

This looks like useful feedback to me. Any chance you'd be willing to elaborate?

I believe this is a reference to the Columbia MAFN and not NYU MathFin.

From my experience, the Columbia MAFN's 6 core mandatory courses are structured such that in your 1st semester you learn about the foundational mathematics and statistics underlying quantitative finance along with a broad overview of financial asset classes and markets, while in the 2nd semester you learn the applications of the foundational mathematics and statistics within finance through option pricing primarily. Beyond that you are left to learn about the industry/industries and further mathematical/statistical methods of interest to you through offered electives. I appreciated this flexibility personally, since it allowed me to explore my career interests as well as opportunities beyond quantitative finance. However, I also acknowledge that it probably isn't the best for everyone and does require you to have a good idea of what you want to do upon graduation from the start in order to select your elective courses to meet those goals.

 

[josephron]

Columbia MAFN alum here. First off, congratulations on being accepted into 2 fantastic programs! I put a review up on QuantNet for the Columbia MAFN program last year and based on conversations I've had with those currently still in the program the points I made in that review still appear to apply.

To your point on programming courses, the Columbia MAFN program usually offers an elective course called Math GR5260 Programming for Quantitative & Computational Finance in both the fall and spring semesters, where C++ is used in the fall and Python is used in the spring. It's a very popular course and the classmates I've spoken to who took it enjoyed it. Furthermore, the mandatory core course MATH GR 5030 Numerical Methods in Finance involves working with Excel/VBA, most statistics courses use R, and most other courses typically let you/your project group use whichever programming language you want for your assignments (With the majority of students using Python). Beyond this, I don't recall an all-encompassing course specifically about microstructure, but concepts from it are within elective courses like Math GR 5300 Hedge Funds Strategies and Risk and Math GR5380 Multi-Asset Portfolio Management to name a couple.

Personally, I would suggest learning to code in at least one language prior to enrolling if you choose to join the Columbia MAFN program, as many courses will assume you know how to code already. I took the C++ course from QuantNet along with the Python course from ScriptUni prior to enrolling and found both to be a solid foundation for my work in the Columbia MAFN program.

Hope that helps! Ultimately, no matter which you choose, you'll come out with a great education and opportunities for a career in finance. I've actually worked with a few alumni from the NYU MathFin program and we've talked a lot about the similarities in our experiences.



I believe this is a reference to the Columbia MAFN and not NYU MathFin.

From my experience, the Columbia MAFN's 6 core mandatory courses are structured such that in your 1st semester you learn about the foundational mathematics and statistics underlying quantitative finance along with a broad overview of financial asset classes and markets, while in the 2nd semester you learn the applications of the foundational mathematics and statistics within finance through option pricing primarily. Beyond that you are left to learn about the industry/industries and further mathematical/statistical methods of interest to you through offered electives. I appreciated this flexibility personally, since it allowed me to explore my career interests as well as opportunities beyond quantitative finance. However, I also acknowledge that it probably isn't the best for everyone and does require you to have a good idea of what you want to do upon graduation from the start in order to select your elective courses to meet those goals.

Do most students take 2 semester to finish or do many do 3?

 

[JSchmo]

Do most students take 2 semester to finish or do many do 3?

Most people in my class took 3 semesters, since that allows you to have a summer internship prior to graduation and lets you take more elective courses. However, if you want to finish in 2 semesters, all you need to do is take 4 electives alongside your mandatory core courses in those first 2 semesters.

 

[josephron]

Most people in my class took 3 semesters, since that allows for you to have a summer internship prior to graduation and lets you take more elective courses. However, if you want to finish in 2 semesters, all you need to do is take 4 electives alongside your mandatory core courses in those first 2 semesters.

Thank you! I just had a few more questions:
1. Is it possible to take more theoretical, mathematical courses? e.g. measure theory. Is that allowed?
2. Are the teachers mostly from industry or do you get to interact with faculty at all? (I am looking for faculty interaction to some degree).

 

[JSchmo]

Thank you! I just had a few more questions:
1. Is it possible to take more theoretical, mathematical courses? e.g. measure theory. Is that allowed?
2. Are the teachers mostly from industry or do you get to interact with faculty at all? (I am looking for faculty interaction to some degree).

No problem, happy to help!

1. Since the Columbia MAFN program is housed within the Columbia mathematics department, I'm pretty sure that you can take the majority of courses offered by the mathematics department. However, I mainly focused my electives towards the industries I wanted to learn more about and applying the mathematics we learned from the core to said industries, so I can't provide a 100% definitive answer on this.
   
   If you're interested in measure theory and are joining the MAFN program though, I'd recommend signing up for the section of STAT GR 5264 Stochastic Processes – Applications I taught by the program director, Lars Tyge Nielsen. He focuses heavily on the theoretical background of the mathematics of finance in that course and spends a good deal of time on measure theory there from what I remember.
   
   
2. For the mandatory core courses, it's a bit of a mix, as I know Lars has worked in industry and the professor for MATH GR 5030 Numerical Methods in Finance works in industry, but I believe the other professors mostly come from academia. On the other hand, pretty much all of the elective courses offered specifically by the Columbia MAFN program are taught by teachers from industry. That said, you can take courses beyond those offered by the Columbia MAFN program itself if you see a professor you'd like to learn from that's from academia or just has a course focused on something you're interested in.
   
   As far as faculty interaction goes, I never had an issue getting in touch with a professor to discuss questions I had on lectures or projects/homework. Each course also looks for TAs each year, so I'm sure if you develop a relationship with a professor you can TA for them as well.

 

[josephron]

No problem, happy to help!

1. Since the Columbia MAFN program is housed within the Columbia mathematics department, I'm pretty sure that you can take the majority of courses offered by the mathematics department. However, I mainly focused my electives towards the industries I wanted to learn more about and applying the mathematics we learned from the core to said industries, so I can't provide a 100% definitive answer on this.
   
   If you're interested in measure theory and are joining the MAFN program though, I'd recommend signing up for the section of STAT GR 5264 Stochastic Processes – Applications I taught by the program director, Lars Tyge Nielsen. He focuses heavily on the theoretical background of the mathematics of finance in that course and spends a good deal of time on measure theory there from what I remember.
   
   
2. For the mandatory core courses, it's a bit of a mix, as I know Lars has worked in industry and the professor for MATH GR 5030 Numerical Methods in Finance works in industry, but I believe the other professors mostly come from academia. On the other hand, pretty much all of the elective courses offered specifically by the Columbia MAFN program are taught by teachers from industry. That said, you can take courses beyond those offered by the Columbia MAFN program itself if you see a professor you'd like to learn from that's from academia or just has a course focused on something you're interested in.
   
   As far as faculty interaction goes, I never had an issue getting in touch with a professor to discuss questions I had on lectures or projects/homework. Each course also looks for TAs each year, so I'm sure if you develop a relationship with a professor you can TA for them as well.

Again, thank you so much, I really appreciate the detail and clarity, this is really helpful

 

[Minerva]

I received an offer from NYU Courant in February and recently from Columbia MAFN as well. I gravitate toward math-heavy programs. I have coding experience but I don't particularly enjoy coding. I hope to work as a buy-side entry level quant researcher position after graduation. Which program would be a better choice?

 

[CourantMathFinance]

The NYU Courant program is definitely math-intensive, maybe more than other programs. I encourage you to choose us. But expect to do a lot of coding both in our program as well as in your quant job afterward.

 

[Skellam]

I would go to Courant if these were my two choices. One could make a solid argument that Courant has the best faculty + curriculum combo out of every program listed here on QuantNet. I have them pretty equal with Columbia MFE, CMU, and Baruch in my personal opinion (what you want out of a career and small preferences will ultimately decide which of these 4 you pick). As I said, if it were me, I would pick Courant and look forward to the data science/machine learning courses from Kolm, Ritter, and Dimov. I'm happy with the decision I made, but I would've been just as content if I decided on NYU as well.

This is not exhaustive, but just some of my thoughts as a future student as well.

Congrats and good luck!

 

[aleewdewx]

I wondered @Minerva what did you end up choosing ? I'm faced with the same dilemna

 

[aleewdewx]

Hello all,

I was hesitating between columbia mafn and nyu courant , the curriculum seems similar but I wondered why Columbia mafn seemed to get much lower employability statistics as well as why alumni seemed to be placed in much less "sexy" position then NYU courant. I am also attracted by the big-name Columbia brings in case I change industry

 

[aleewdewx]

any input would be appreciated

 

[kevin zhang_]

I wondered @Minerva what did you end up choosing ? I'm faced with the same dilemna

I am currently in the industry.
I would recommend NYU for many reasons.

 

[CourantMathFinance]

I am currently in the industry.
I would recommend NYU for many reasons.

I, of course, agree! But I'd be interested knowing the many reasons.

 

[CourantMathFinance]

If you have any questions about the Courant program, please either post them here or message me.

 

[zhen lieu]

Definitely Cournat. Cournat is big name too.

 

[dylanz]

I received an offer from NYU Courant in February and recently from Columbia MAFN as well. I gravitate toward math-heavy programs. I have coding experience but I don't particularly enjoy coding. I hope to work as a buy-side entry level quant researcher position after graduation. Which program would be a better choice?

Of course courant. The peer assessment is very high for courant, the quality of the math courses in courant is unbelievale.

 

[dylanz]

Of course courant.