- Joined
- 9/28/12
- Messages
- 5
- Points
- 11
Hi guys!
I could hardly make the choice among USC, Poly and IIT's programs, even though I've read a lot about them. My undergraduate major is computer science. EAGER to enter in quant field to work to live in US.
USC's MFE is relatively new without much reputation, also hard to find the job. Anyway, I think USC has the ability to make it a promising program, which could add weight to the program.
Poly has two sides comments, quite confusing. Being in NYC is a great advantage(or is it that great?), but Poly admits many students, which brings competition within them. Additionally, look at NYC outside Poly, graduates face cometitors from other TOP programs. All of these causes the program's future uncertain.
btw, the consolidation wouldn't likely contribute to the de facto improvement.
As far as IIT, I didn't do much research, taking it the same level as Poly.
Turn to quantnet for help. Thanks for any advice.
I could hardly make the choice among USC, Poly and IIT's programs, even though I've read a lot about them. My undergraduate major is computer science. EAGER to enter in quant field to work to live in US.
USC's MFE is relatively new without much reputation, also hard to find the job. Anyway, I think USC has the ability to make it a promising program, which could add weight to the program.
Poly has two sides comments, quite confusing. Being in NYC is a great advantage(or is it that great?), but Poly admits many students, which brings competition within them. Additionally, look at NYC outside Poly, graduates face cometitors from other TOP programs. All of these causes the program's future uncertain.
btw, the consolidation wouldn't likely contribute to the de facto improvement.
As far as IIT, I didn't do much research, taking it the same level as Poly.
Turn to quantnet for help. Thanks for any advice.